these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

    Depending on if your have power everything or not, 3400lbs to 3600lbs I beleive. Also I think Ponitacs wiegh more than Camaros. If someone else knows please post.
    08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
    96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

      Originally posted by ava1219 View Post
      anyone know the stock weight of a 3.8 with no one in it?
      I've found between 3,306 - 3,331 for the 3.8L coupe, depending on which year ('96-'02) and what source. Most sources I've found don't list differences for things like auto v. manual, t-tops v. hard top, power v. non-power accessories, etc. so I'm sure the numbers could be off by more than the 25 lbs.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

        thanks guys

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

          Originally posted by ava1219 View Post
          what year is your car? mines an 02. from around 40 + (mph) is when it really picks up. in the higher rpms the car sounds like its flying, but its not really going anywhere bc its so heavy. once again my cars basically stock. thats why i call it "the fastest slowest car" lol idk i cant even describe it that well its like fast but not fast at the same time. i see the power and potential of the 3.8 engine, and i see me not really going anywhere just, the car sounding mean. its kinda like a bark with not much bite. but at higher rpms its got a pretty good bite for a v6 carrying all that weight. i cant wait to reduce alot of this weight i wanna see its potential cause it really does have it.
          96...

          2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
          1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


          Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

            Originally posted by EarlR View Post
            You guys should check out some of the newer V6 cars then: when my brother's g/f had her Xtera totaled earlier this year, they had to get a rental while they were looking for a replacement. They ended up renting an '07 Charger with the V6 & auto, and of course being brothers we couldn't help ourselves. I only had the Camaro about 2 months at that time, and hadn't really gotten the chance to play with it yet, but when we both were leaving my mom's house at the same time one evening we got the chance. That Charger walked the Camaro from around 20 up to 65-70 when we had to back off for upcoming traffic. It wasn't a huge difference, but it was definitely walking away.

            She eventually bought an '05 Mustang, again with the V6 & auto: I haven't had the chance to run him in that one yet (I don't think she let's him drive it much - smart girl), but she did let me test drive it right after she bought it and I think it is every bit the equal of the Camaro.

            Oh, and right before I bought my Camaro I test drove an '03 Mustang with the manual trans - keeping in mind I was looking for a car to build into a road-race car - and while I didn't like the feel of the 'stang as far as handling, I tend to believe it is really close to the Camaro in straight-line performance.
            thats why i established 02 and before, the new 09 camaro has an option called the camaro BLACK, has a 300 horse 3.6 liter, the new 350z has a 332hp 3.5 liter. New v-6 are bad!
            Team NoVa

            2000 Firebird- Intake, Pacesetters, !cat, full 2.5 to flowcrapster, 1.9 rockers, LS6 springs and Intense modded retainers, WS6 speedlines, T/A bumpers and hatch, 5 spd swapped, SOON TO BE nitrous'd and cammed.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

              Originally posted by flamingchicken View Post
              thats why i established 02 and before, the new 09 camaro has an option called the camaro BLACK, has a 300 horse 3.6 liter, the new 350z has a 332hp 3.5 liter. New v-6 are bad!
              ya i wish they could of pumped out more hp out of our 3.8 f-bodys

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                3.8 and 3.4

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                  all the new v6 camaros come with 300hp...its not a special option lol...

                  2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
                  1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


                  Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                    Originally posted by LETZRIDE View Post
                    all the new v6 camaros come with 300hp...its not a special option lol...
                    haha yeah i was fixin to say the same thing....
                    disclaimer: \"warning.. this post may contain somewhat of a funny comment if read properly... take my comment out of context at your own discretion...\"

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                      With my set-up, the car doesnt' really come alive till around 3200 or so; anything below that and it's hard to tell the car's pickin up speed :P. Get above that and it really throws ya back into the seats!
                      Last edited by RadRacer; 01-01-2009, 11:25 PM.
                      ~97 3.8L V6 Camaro~
                      A few things

                      Only Member of Team Hooker?!?

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                        Originally posted by ava1219 View Post
                        ya i wish they could of pumped out more hp out of our 3.8 f-bodys
                        Back when the 3.8 was introduced to the F-Body it was an engine that produced a lot at that time. It's enough for me, thats why I bought a Z28, haha.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                          I race my car at lower speeds, I prefer a dig. With the a4 my car launches pretty well from a slow roll (10 or less), 25mph, and between 45-55. At all those speeds my tach is usually around 2k or higher. I raced from a 35mph roll once, it just switched gears and the tach was at 1.2k, i punched it, but my car was like GTFO, took forever to get going

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                            Originally posted by 00FlowCamaro View Post
                            Back when the 3.8 was introduced to the F-Body it was an engine that produced a lot at that time. It's enough for me, thats why I bought a Z28, haha.
                            it is...I mean...mid 1995, how many vehicles for 14g's could you buy brand new, that looked sleek (and still is ahead of its time) that also had 200 horsies sitting on tap?

                            2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
                            1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


                            Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                              Originally posted by ava1219 View Post
                              made a right hand turn onto the highway today and just felt like gunning it to 75. they dont pick up too well in low rpms which is somthing i hate about them. the tourque isnt too great. but when these 3.8s get in higher rpms these things move! i mean they really have potential i just wish they weren't so damn heavy! btw mines an 02 3.8 a4 camaro. my cars basically stock just a 160 degree thermo and a k & n airfilter. iam impressed with the 160 degree thermo bc my car doesnt even get over 190 degrees just with putting in the thermo still havn't gotten the manual fanswitch. it used to get up to 210 or more very quickly when i had the stock 195 degree thermo. if these cars weren't so damn heavy and came with higher gears they would be pretty damn quick stock.
                              Funny, I would have said the exact opposite about 3.8's. They have enough torque down low to get going decently, but they have absolutely no high end power.

                              I'm guessing your v6 camaro is the fastest car youve driven since youre saying it feels like it has lots of top end. And I don't mean that as an insult, but once you drive something that actually has some top end power, when you go back to the 3.8 youll be really disapointed at the high rpm power.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: these 3.8s move pretty well in high rpms

                                Thats why 3.73's or biggger gears and a cam really wakes the 3.8 up, plus weight reduction, You'll have low end with the gears, and top end with the right cam at 2500-3000 rpms and up.
                                08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
                                96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                • Dongrossmd
                                  Throttle Position Sensor trouble shooting
                                  by Dongrossmd
                                  I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...
                                  3 weeks ago
                                • ssms5411
                                  New stereo
                                  by ssms5411
                                  Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...
                                  3 weeks ago

                                FORUM SPONSORS

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X